Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Mere Refusal To Marry After Sexual Relations Not Offence of Cheating : Bombay High Court

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on December 23, 2021 by Administrator

By – Aishwarya

Justice Anuja Prabhudessai observed that in the instance case the couple had indulged in sexual relations for over three years; the woman’s testimony did not indicate that she was under a misconception of a promise of marriage nor was there evidence to show the man didn’t intend to marry her since the very beginning.

“In the absence of evidence to prove that the prosecutrix had consented for physical relationship on a misconception of fact, as stipulated under Section 90 of IPC, the mere refusal to marry would not constitute offence under Section 417 of the IPC.”

In an FIR, the woman alleged that the accused had sexual relationship with her with promise of marriage, and subsequently declined to marry her. After the trial, the man was acquitted of rape but punished for cheating/fraud. In its order, the court relied on a catena of judgments regarding what would constitute “fraud”, “consent” and if a man can be held guilty of fraud just because he refused marriage.

The court relied heavily on the apex court’s judgement in Maheshwar Tigga Vs. State of Jharkhand, in which the apex court held, a consent given under a misconception of fact is no consent in the eye of the law.

The court observed,

“The evidence on record indicates that the prosecutrix and the accused were known to each other. They had indulged in sexual relationship for a period of over three years. The evidence of PW1-prosecutrix does not indicate that she had sexual relationship with the accused under misconception of fact, with regard to the promise of marriage or that her consent was based on fraudulent misrepresentation of marriage. There is no evidence on record to indicate that since the inception accused did not intend to marry her.”

#news #legalnews #cheating #fraud #currentaffairs #rape

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on January 25, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: On January 8, the Supreme Court nullified the remission granted by the Gujarat government...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on January 22, 2024 by News Desk Issue:- A plea was filed by 4 petitioners who sought to quash the FIR that...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on January 4, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: The recent decision by the Delhi High Court granting bail to a man accused...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on November 18, 2023 by News Desk Problem: Releasing the Rape Case After It Was Settled Situational Facts: An agreement between the...