Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Madras High Court rejects the petition filed by Tamil Actor Vijay regarding the entry tax on his imported vehicle.

Madras High Court rejected the petition filed by Tamil Actor Vijay in the year 2012. Petitioner contended upon the demand of entry tax on his imported Rolls Royce Ghost car. Further, Justice SM Subramanian imposed Rs 1 lakh on the Actor for eluding the entry tax. Court further directed the actor to contribute the money to the Tamil Nadu’s Corona relief fund.

Socio Legal Corp

By- Vanshika Sharma

Madras High Court rejected the petition filed by Tamil Actor Vijay in the year 2012. Petitioner contended upon the demand of entry tax on his imported Rolls Royce Ghost car. Further, Justice SM Subramanian imposed Rs 1 lakh on the Actor for eluding the entry tax. Court further directed the actor to contribute the money to the Tamil Nadu’s Corona relief fund.

Addressing this, Court remarked, “The common men are motivated and encouraged to behave as a lawful citizen and pay tax and to thrive hard to achieve social justice in the society. If the rich, affluent and reputed persons fail to pay the tax as applicable, then this Court with pain, records that it would be a long way to achieve the constitutional goals”.

Advocate S. Kmnaresan representing the Actor stated about the payment of import duty to the Customs Department under the Customs Act. The advocate also talked about being assigned new Registration Mark for his petitioner’s vehicle. However, the actor is told to pay Entry tax.

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and contended upon being imposed to pay extraordinary Entry Tax on his imported vehicles.

In response to Actor’s plea, Court observed, “Filing a writ petition, avoiding payment of Entry tax and keeping the writ petition pending for about nine years, can never be appreciated”.

Court further held, “The taxation system is the backbone of the nation’s economy, the Court explained. The judge highlighted that the payment of tax is mandatory and not voluntary payment or donation, which one decided on one’s own.” Court also emphasised upon social justice through Article 38(2) and directed the actor to pay entry tax within two week after adjusting 20% of tax.

Court has now adjourned the matter for July 28, 2021.

Comments
Advertisement

Related Posts

Inside Court News

Issue On a plea seeking to exclude those with yearly incomes under 8 lakhs from paying income tax, the Madurai Bench of the Madras...

SLC Reads

Written by Vidisha Mathur In the recent case of C. Soman v Secretary, Hindu Religious Charitable Department, and Others – the Petitioner called on...

SLC Reads

Written by Shaurya Mahajan The Madras High Court in the case of A. Periyakaruppan v. The Principal Secretary to Government and Another invoked the...

SLC Reads

Written by Neha Virmani On Monday division bench of Madras High Court consisting of PD Audikesavalu & Sanjib Banerjee dismissed the PIL petition (R...