Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Socio Legal Corp

SLC Reads

Labour Rights As Human Rights in India

One of the questions greatly mooted in the advent of the twentieth century is whether labour rights are human rights. This question has attracted much interest in recent years among lawyers, academic scholars, trade unionists and other activists and has given rise to heated debates. In human rights law and labour law scholarship, some endorse the character of labour rights as human rights without hesitation, while others view it with scepticism and suspicion.

Labour Rights as Human Rights

A definition of labour rights is necessary before moving on. Labour rights are entitlements that relate specifically to the worker’s role. Some of these rights are exercised individually, and others collectively. They can include a right to work in a job freely chosen, a right to fair working conditions, which may encompass issues as diverse as a just wage or protection of privacy, a right to be protected from arbitrary and unjustified dismissal, a right to belong to and be represented by a trade union; a right to strike. These rights may be based on different foundations, such as freedom, dignity or capability.

History of Labour Laws

Labour law arose due to the demands of workers for better conditions, the right to organise, and the simultaneous demands of employers to restrict the powers of workers in many organisations and to keep labour costs low. Employers’ costs can increase due to workers organising to win higher wages or by-laws imposing costly requirements, such as health and safety or equal opportunity conditions. Workers’ organisations, such as trade unions, can also transcend purely industrial disputes and gain political power – which some employers may oppose. Therefore, the state of labour law at any one time is both the product of and a component of struggles between different interests in society.

The Positive Approach

Many scholars have approached this issue in different dimensions. The most straightforward answer to the question of whether labour rights are human rights comes from a positivist perspective and is often found in international law literature. A positivist lists human rights treaties protecting labour rights or other documents explicitly recognizing labour rights as human rights as a starting point and is satisfied that the answer is positive if it is sufficiently supported in law.

Labour Legislation in India

Labour law, also known as employment law, is the body of laws, administrative rulings, and precedents which address the legal rights of and restrictions on working people and their organizations. As such, it mediates many aspects of the relationship between trade unions, employers and employees. In other words, Labour law defines the rights and obligations of workers, union members and employers in the workplace.

Constitutional Provisions concerning Labour Law

The Constitution of India confers innumerable rights for the protection of labour. The Indian constitution, through various articles, protects, supports, and acts as a guideline to various labour laws for their effective implementation and functioning. The relevance of the dignity of human labour and the need for protecting and safeguarding the interest of labour as human beings have been enshrined in Chapter- III (Articles 16, 19, 21, 23 & 24) and Chapter IV (Articles 39, 39-A, 41, 42, 43, 43A, 46, 47 & 54) of the Constitution of India keeping in line with Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy which set an aim to which the activities of the state are to be guided.

Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits traffic in human beings, beggars, and other similar forms of forced labour. ‘Traffic in human beings’ means selling and buying men and women like goods, including immoral traffic in women and children for immoral” or other purposes. Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children below 14 years of age in factories and hazardous employment. This provision is certainly in the interest of public health and the safety of the life of children. Article 39 of the Constitution imposes upon the State an obligation to ensure that the health and strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of the children are not abused and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age or strength. Indian Constitution protects and provides safeguards to the labourer.


  • There should be a more responsible attitude on the part of the management.
  • There should be adequate support from the trade unions.
  • There should be proper coordination of the functions of multiple tripartite institutions at the plant level.
  • Proper qualifications should be described for the appointment of a conciliation officer.
  • In case the negotiation fails, the workers should be allowed for adjudication.
  • Steps should be taken to promote internal leadership and give more responsible roles. Internal leadership should be kept outside the pale of victimization to hasten the process of building up internal leadership, and the permissible limit of outsiders in the executive of the union should be reduced.
  • Awareness of the obligation to society and the nation should be inculcated among the leaders, that trade unionism should be confused with total politics, and employer and employee amity and harmony are needed for the hour.

However, these suggestions are made in the solemn hope that in the era of LPG, where workers‟ rights are getting eroded daily, labour rights will be adequately and effectively protected as human rights and eligible for public law remedy.

Written By - Nishant Kumar & Edited By - Ayush Kumar

Written By

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Bhargav Patel

    April 20, 2023 at 11:53 AM

    I am academician at Gujarat. I resigned previous institution after 01 month notice period. However previous instruction not provide me 01 month salary and relieve documents. They are saying 03 months have to be filled. So what i do in this case, because my current organization will not accept after 03 month period if i will fill this period.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Supreme court on Thursday ordered the release of a convict who spent 26 years behind bars stating that denying him a premature release would...

SLC Reads

In today’s digital era, many individuals find themselves deeply engrossed in their devices. According to the Global Digital Report, an individual spends about 6.5...

Inside Court News

The Supreme Court on Wednesday requested an oral statement from the Central Bureau of Investigation about the 1997 Uphaar fire Tragedy in response to...

Inside Court News

Issue – The Supreme Court has ruled that the day of remand must be taken into account when evaluating a request for default bail...