Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Interim Bail Granted To 13 Prisoners Who Were Languishing in Jail For 14-22 Years Despite Proving Juvenility By Supreme Court

The plea submitted that in spite of all the petitioners being juveniles as has been held by the Juvenile Justice Board, the State of Uttar Pradesh had failed to take any steps for their release. They also highlighted that according to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) (Amendment) Act, 2006, the plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage of the trial and also after final disposal of the case.

Socio Legal Corp

By Arshita

Supreme Court granted interim bail to 13 prisoners of Agra Jail, who were juveniles at the time of the commission of the offense. The prisoners, in spite of being juveniles, have spent about 14 to 22 years in prison.


The bench consisting of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice V Ramasubramanain granted interim bail on personal bond and gave the remarks: “It is not in dispute that 13 Petitioners have been held by Juvenile Justice Board as juveniles. Let interim bail be granted to them by presenting personal bonds”


The petitioners’advocate, Rishi Malhotra, submitted that this was a case of “illegal detention”.

“Though in the majority of the cases their statutory criminal appeals are pending before the High Court against their conviction under various IPC offenses, the necessity and the need of the hour is to direct immediate release of these Petitioners in view of the fact that not only they are declared juvenile but they have already undergone a maximum period of detention provided under Section 15 read with Section 16 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 viz. 3 years”,

The advocate representing the Uttar Pradesh Government submitted that he does not object to bail, but there should be verification.


The plea submitted that in spite of all the petitioners being juveniles as has been held by the Juvenile Justice Board, the State of Uttar Pradesh had failed to take any steps for their release. They also highlighted that according to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) (Amendment) Act, 2006, the plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage of the trial and also after final disposal of the case.

The petitioners contended that the imprisonment of juveniles for about 12 to 14 years defeats the purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act,


The plea prayed for the immediate release of the Petitioners in light of the JJ Board order citing Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.

Comments
Advertisement

Related Posts

Inside Court News

Allahabad High Court mentioned about seeking anticipatory bail, stated that under Section 438 of CrPC it is only a statutory right.

SLC Reads

Written by Vidisha Mathur In the case of Raman Mundhe s/o Prakash Mundhe and Another v State of Maharashtra before the Bombay High Court,...

SLC Reads

Written by Vidisha Mathur In the Special Leave Petition titled M/s Chopra Fabricators and Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. and Another v Bharat Pumps and Compressors...

SLC Reads

@newsdesk_slc Anoop Kumar Singh & Anr v. State of UP & others Allahabad HC dismissed petition on re-evaluation of the answer sheets. The Uttar...