Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Interference by courts in election process should be to facilitate it’s completion and not to postpone it: Bombay HC

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on July 9, 2022 by


Anant Baburao Golait v. The State Election Commission of Maharashtra

Several petitions were filed challenging the notification which was about ward formations for Maharashtra local body elections and prayed to set it aside. The court held that it cannot stall elections to local bodies just because certain disgruntled voices are raised against them.

The Bombay HC referred to SC precedent in which CJ Dipankar Datta and CJ RV Ghuge had clearly stated that the court would interfere only for progress and election process and not for postponing the same.

Advocate Devdatt P Palodkar appearing for the petitioner argued that since the election process has not yet started so the orders passed by several Collectors of districts matter pertaining to delimitation or allotment of election seats, preparing for electoral rolls can be amenable and the court must hear the writ petition thereon as per Art. 226 & 243-ZG of Indian Constitution.

The Bombay HC refused to hear the same on 3 grounds:

  1. The petitioner has remedy u/s 21 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act.
  2. Since HC abided by SC it imposed limitations on its own power to act under A. 226 and refused to pass orders which would indirectly postpone the election.
  3. In Suresh Mahajan v. The State of MP & Anr. SC held that the elections are under obligation of the State Election Commission and it must not be delayed.

The Court denied interfering in the election process, therefore the case was dismissed.

Written by,



Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on December 4, 2023 by News Desk The petition filed by EAS Sarma and Jagdeep S Chhokar challenges the deployment of Defence...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on December 4, 2023 by News Desk On 30th November, SC had held that under order 7 rule 11, at the stage...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on December 1, 2023 by News Desk The Bombay HC had recently appointed a court receiver and had given direction to the...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on November 30, 2023 by News Desk On Tuesday the Kerala High Court had refused the claim for compensation that was made...