Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Further incarceration will ring the death knell for him: Varavara Rao moves Supreme Court seeking bail in Bhima Koregaon case.

Socio Legal Corp

Written By- Pretika Tiwari

Dr P Varavara Rao vs National Investigation Agency & Ors.

The Telugu poet and Bhima Koregaon Elgar Parishad accused P Varavara Rao had filed a petition before the court against the impugned order of the Bombay High Court. Through the order passed on April 13, Rao was denied the permission to stay at his residence in Telangana and the court had given instructions to speed up the trial and three months’ worth of temporary bail to cover his cataract surgery. The Supreme Court bench, comprising of Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala, issued the direction on the matter and agreed to hear the case on July 11.

The High Court, in its order, stated, “Seriousness and severity of the crime would remain till such time the accused is pronounced not guilty of the crime alleged to have been committed by him…”. Through the current special leave petition, Rao, out on bail due to medical reasons, claims that any more imprisonment will “ring the death knell” for him because old age and failing health constitute a lethal combination. The petitioner submitted before the court that in July 2021, Father Stan Swamy, an 83-year-old activist for tribal rights, who was also an accused party in the case, passed dead in detention. Also, it is well-established law, and the Supreme Court has ruled that bail can be granted in UAPA cases, notwithstanding the law’s prohibition on it when fundamental rights are violated.

The NIA had accused Rao and 14 other activists of furthering the agenda of banned CPI (Maoist) and conspiring against the Government. Therefore, they were booked under the UAPA. NIA alleged that on December 31, 2017, at the Elgar Parishad Cultural Event, hate speeches were made that contributed to violence at the Bhima Koregaon. But the accused claimed that they had not participated in the event and that electronic evidence was planted against them.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Madras HC sought responses from the Karnataka and Kerala government on their delay in nominating nodal officers for Special Investigating Team (SIT) to look...

SLC Reads

The National Human Rights Commission has expressly been mandated to promote Human Rights literacy and awareness vide Section 12 (h) of the Protection of...


Recently, Delhi High Court ordered a Jaipur-based cafe to pay damages of Rs.2 lakhs along with a whopping litigation cost of Rs.13 lakhs to...

Inside Court News

Allahabad High Court mentioned about seeking anticipatory bail, stated that under Section 438 of CrPC it is only a statutory right.