Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

CBI, police ignores complaints from Judges about threats.

The Supreme Court on Friday said Central agencies such as the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Intelligence Bureau and State police forces chose to ignore complaints from judges about abusive messages and threats even as attacks on the judiciary were on the rise. The court suggested the formation of a special force to protect judges, especially trial judges who decide criminal cases involving high-profile accused.

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on August 6, 2021 by Administrator

By- Neha.

The Supreme Court on Friday said Central agencies such as the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Intelligence Bureau and State police forces chose to ignore complaints from judges about abusive messages and threats even as attacks on the judiciary were on the rise. The court suggested the formation of a special force to protect judges, especially trial judges who decide criminal cases involving high-profile accused.

“We have seen that in criminal cases involving high-profile people, there is a new trend of maligning judges. There is no freedom for judges to work. The CBI, the police, the IB do not help the judiciary. I am making this statement with some sense of responsibility… In several cases across the country involving gangsters and high-profile and powerful accused, they threaten judges, not just physically but also mentally through abusive messages, peeping into judges’ online accounts, etc. We are very sorry to say that the CBI did nothing about complaints made to it… There is still no change in the attitude of the CBI,” Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana said. Attorney-General K.K. Venugopal, who was asked to assist the court, related an incident of a Magistrate who was threatened on the eve of taking up a case against some gangsters. “His daughter’s life was threatened. So, given a choice between his daughter’s life and doing justice, he adjourned the case… Judges as a class are more vulnerable, say, than bureaucrats,” the top law officer said.

The court asked whether Jharkhand had “washed its hands off” any responsibility of investigating the daylight murder of Jharkhand judge Uttam Anand by transferring the case to the CBI. The court said the judge’s death was a result of the Jharkhand government’s “negligence” to protect its judges. The CJI said the State government chose to ignore threats to judges like Mr. Anand, who was working in Dhanbad district, where the powerful coal mafia reigns.

“A young judge lost his life because of the negligence of Jharkhand government,” Chief Justice Ramana said about the tragic death.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts