“A new perspective: Valuation of experience on all courts in a legal seniority”
Last Updated on February 23, 2025 by NewsDesk SLC
The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the issue of senior designations within the legal profession, which emphasizes that these praise should not be restricted to the defenders of the practice in the Supreme Court and the upper courts. This position arose from a case related to the request of a lawyer of the Court of First Instance with respect to the limited opportunities granted for senior designations, which have mainly favored those who operate within the highest judicial fields.
The court recognized that the lawyers of the Court of First Instance often have experience and substantial skills that justify recognition, but the current system tends to marginalize their contributions. This practice perpetuates a significant imbalance in the way in which antiquity is perceived in the legal field, effectively leaving those whose experience is obtained through years of practice at the level of the Court of First Instance.
Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul, speaking on behalf of the bank, said that the legal community must recognize that competence and age can arise from various levels of judicial practice. The predominant tendency to grant senior designations predominantly to the defenders of the higher courts creates an inequitable landscape that undermines the capacities of the professionals of the Court of First Instance. The court urged a reevaluation of what constitutes antiquity, advocating an inclusive approach that recognizes talent and experience in all courts.
This statement is part of a broader movement within the legal community, emphasizing the need for equitable recognition for all professionals. The position of the Supreme Court suggests that the Law Council of India and other legal government agencies should reconsider its criteria to grant senior designations, implementing mechanisms that allow a fair evaluation based on merit instead of the prestige of the judicial jurisdiction.
In addition, the comments of the Supreme Court reflect a commitment to promote a diverse and balanced legal profession, where the skills of the litigating lawyers are valued equally. By advocating these changes, the court not only addresses the peculiarities of the senior designation, but also highlights the disparities in the opportunities available for several levels of legal professionals.
In conclusion, the position of the Supreme Court marks a significant change towards inclusion and equity within the legal profession. Challenges Perceptions of long -standing antiquity and encourage a reevaluation of traditional practices that can favor the defenders of the upper courts, thus accelerating the way for a more representative and equitable legal panorama in India.
