Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

High Court

Madras HC quashed the bar association’s order restraining the lawyer from appearing before any court

Madras High Court

Last Updated on August 14, 2024 by NewsDesk SLC

The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice C Kumarappan observed that the right to practice law is a fundamental right that cannot be barred from bar association by suspension.

Continuously, added advocate should maintain a cordial relationship with the members of the bar association to maintain work efficiency in court.

The petition challenged by Adv. Senthil against the order of the Tambaram Bar Association suspended him, further Senthil submit the reason for the suspension was that he attended the court which was contrary to the decision of the Bar Association not to attend the court.

The court noted that the Bar Association should use the apex court boycott as a last resort and could not continue the boycott on litigants which affects their rights and delivery justice system.

HC observed that the order passed by the Tambaram Bar Association did not consider that the members of the Bar were expected to respect the freedom of speech and practice of others

Thus, the Court accepted the petition and quashed the order of the Bar Association.

Case Law: V Senthil Vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of TN & Puducherry

Written By: Kirti Sharma

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Supreme Court

C.J.I. asked him to lower his pitch as the address is being made to the judges and not to the people watching through video...

High Court

A lawyer challenges Section 69 of the Bhaaratiya Nyaya Sanhita in the Kerala High Court, arguing that it violates constitutional rights and reflects gender...

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.