Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Judiciary

Supreme Court Declines Stay on Chief Election Commissioner Selection Process

Supreme Court of India

Last Updated on March 24, 2024 by News Desk

Introduction:


The Supreme Court has issued an order regarding the batch of pleas seeking a stay on the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023. This Act removes the Chief Justice of India from the selection panel appointing election commissioners. The Court’s decision comes after a detailed consideration of the matter, balancing the urgency of the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections and the procedural concerns raised by the petitioners.

Issue:


The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant a stay on the implementation of the Act, considering its potential impact on the forthcoming elections and the procedural irregularities alleged by the petitioners.

Rule:


The Court referred to the Constitution Bench judgment in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India, which established the Selection Committee as a temporary measure until a law regarding the appointment of Election Commissioners was enacted by the Parliament. It emphasized that interim orders should be reserved for exceptional circumstances and that judicial restraint must be exercised in matters concerning the constitutional validity of legislation.

Analysis:


While expressing concerns over the procedure followed by the Centre in appointing two new Election Commissioners, the Court noted that the merits of the appointed officers were not questioned by the petitioners. It also acknowledged the importance of maintaining a balance and check in the functioning of the Election Commission, particularly with the presence of the newly appointed commissioners.

Conclusion:


Ultimately, the Court declined to grant a stay on the Act, citing the impending Lok Sabha Elections and the potential disruption that a stay order could cause. However, it highlighted the need for procedural integrity in the selection process of Election Commissioners. The decision reflects a delicate balance between the urgency of electoral processes and the principles of procedural fairness and constitutional validity.

Written by — Athi Venkatesh AVD

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Judiciary

Last Updated on July 26, 2024 by News Desk The Supreme Court currently has 50 Constitution Bench matters awaiting adjudication, as reported by the...

High Court

Last Updated on July 26, 2024 by News Desk Delhi High Court on Friday rejected the public interest litigation (PIL) which challenged the central...

High Court

Last Updated on July 25, 2024 by News Desk An FIR was registered against one, P.D Agarwal, of negligence for not putting up the...

High Court

Last Updated on July 25, 2024 by News Desk The Madras High Court has clarified that police officers below the rank of Inspector do...