Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Inside Court News

Section 12A Withdrawal of CIRP Application Can Be Maintained Before the Creation of the CoC, ruled Supreme Court

Last Updated on March 30, 2023 by Administrator

In ruling on an appeal filed in Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd. & Anr., the Bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and Vikram Nath held that Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) does not prohibit entertaining requests for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) to be withdrawn even before the creation of the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”). Additionally, while both sections do not conflict, Regulation 30A of the CIRP Regulations advances the goals of Section 12A of the IBC.

In the case, Fruit beverage production and marketing are the businesses that Manpasand Beverages Ltd. (“Corporate Debtor”) engages in. The Corporate Debtor previously received packing supplies from Huhtamaki PPL Ltd. (“Operational Creditor”). In response to a default of Rs. 1,31,00,825/-, the Operational Creditor submitted a petition under Section 9 of the IBC to initiate CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. On 01.03.2021, the NCLT acknowledged the appeal and began CIRP proceedings against the corporate debtor.

The Parties engaged into Settlement two days after the start of CIRP, before the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) had even been established. The Corporate Debtor had five days to settle the Rs. 95.72 Lakhs required by the Settlement Terms. In the interim, the Corporate Debtor had appealed the Order dated 01.03.2021 to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”), which was dropped, with the option to re-file the appeal in the event the settlement fell through. Until the NCLT rules on the motion made pursuant to Section 12A of the IBC, the NCLAT also postponed the formation of the CoC. The CoC was created by the IRP on April 15, 2021. In light of these events, the Suspended Director of Corporate Debtor (“Appellant”) appealed the NCLT order dated April 13, 2021 before the Supreme Court.

Supreme in its decision said that Regulation 30A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2018 imposes obligations on NCLT.  As well as even before the CoC is established, Section 12A of the IBC does not prevent considering petitions for withdrawal.

The 13.04.2021 NCLT ruling has been revoked. The IRP’s withdrawal motion under Regulation 30A was approved by the Bench. The corporate debtor’s creditors, however, would be unaffected by the ruling and could continue to assert their claims through the proper channels.

Case Title: Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd. Ors

Written by: Srijan raj

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisement

Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on February 28, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India acquitted an accused individual charged...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on February 28, 2024 by News Desk Issue:- The court was deciding the grant of bail to 2 persons who were caught...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on February 28, 2024 by News Desk Recently, the Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra government to consider the 26/11 Mumbai terror...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on February 27, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: Arushi Singh, a specially-abled woman, has taken her grievance of alleged humiliation at Kolkata...