Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Inside Court News

Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in ‘IKEA’ Trademark Infringement Case

Last Updated on November 18, 2023 by News Desk

Issue: After a global furniture manufacturer named Inter IKEA Systems BV filed a trademark infringement lawsuit, the Delhi High Court recently issued an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against Kerala-based furniture company “Ikea Luxury Furniture.” In the lawsuit, it was claimed that the defendant was using the well-known mark “IKEA” illegally on a variety of furniture items, within hoardings, and on product packaging.

The case’s facts: According to Inter IKEA Systems BV, the Swedish company owns the globally recognized “IKEA” mark. It was alleged that Ikea Luxury Furniture, the defendant, utilized the mark on similar products and catered to the same customer base. The defendant continued to use the “IKEA” mark after being given a legal warning, which compelled the plaintiff to file a lawsuit.

Reasoning: Inter IKEA Systems BV claimed that the “IKEA” mark is very recognizable and unique, making it worthy of protection. In contrast, the defendant continued to use the mark after receiving notice from the court. The plaintiff’s trademark needed to be protected from any potential damage caused by the defendant’s wrongful use, and the court had to consider how important such protection was.

Justification for the Decision: In her remarks, Justice Prathiba M. Singh emphasized the “IKEA” brand’s uniqueness and familiarity on a global scale. The court decided that an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was justified in this instance since the defendant was using the mark for similar products and was targeting the same customer category. The court’s ruling was significantly supported by the defendant’s inability to stop using the mark in spite of a formal notice. The plaintiff’s mark warranted protection, the court said, and future infringement needed to be stopped by an injunction.

Judgment: The court ruled that Ikea Luxury Furniture could not use the word “IKEA” or any other name that is confusingly similar as a trade name or trademark on posters, banners, handbills, hoardings, or other promotional materials. Protecting the plaintiff’s rights and preventing future illegal use of the trademark are the goals of the injunction. Furthermore, Ikea was given permission by the court to get in touch with JustDial and request that the defendant’s page, which was tagged as “IKEA Luxury Furniture,” be removed.


Written By: Nikita Shankar @nikitaashankar

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on December 1, 2023 by News Desk The Bombay HC had recently appointed a court receiver and had given direction to the...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on September 29, 2023 by News Desk The Delhi High Court has issued clarifications and finalised settlement terms in a trademark infringement...

SLC Reads

Last Updated on April 20, 2023 by Administrator What are Intellectual Property Rights? Intellectual Property refers to the creations of the human mind like...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on November 3, 2022 by Administrator What: In a recent case of a trademark dispute between Rajnigandha and RajniPaan, the Delhi High...