Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Inside Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Right to Information: Information Cannot Be Denied Solely on Grounds of Bulkiness

Last Updated on April 27, 2024 by News Desk


In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court emphasized the fundamental right to information and clarified that authorities cannot refuse disclosure solely on the basis of information volume. The case, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade v. Kamal Jit Chibber, involved the denial of information sought under the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) by the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT) on the grounds of voluminous nature.


The central issue revolved around whether denying information solely due to its bulkiness constitutes a valid reason under the provisions of the RTI Act, specifically Section 8, which outlines exemptions to information disclosure.


The Court, led by Justice Subramonium Prasad, highlighted that accepting such a contention would effectively introduce an additional exemption under Section 8 of the RTI Act, contradicting its spirit of transparency and accountability. The RTI Act mandates disclosure unless information falls under specific exemptions outlined in Section 8.


The Court scrutinized the arguments presented by IIFT, which cited the voluminous nature of the requested information and the strain it would place on resources. However, it found no legal basis to deny information solely on these grounds, especially considering that the requested information did not fall within any of the exemptions outlined in Section 8 of the RTI Act.


Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Central Information Commission (CIC), directing IIFT to provide the complete information requested by Kamal Jit Chibber. The Court rejected IIFT’s petition, asserting that denying information based solely on its bulkiness would undermine the core principles of the RTI Act. This ruling reaffirms the importance of transparency and accountability in governance, ensuring that citizens’ right to information is upheld without unjustified barriers.

Through this ruling, the Delhi High Court sets a precedent that emphasizes the primacy of the right to information, preventing arbitrary denials based on administrative convenience or resource constraints.

Written by — Athi Venkatesh AVD

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 23, 2024 by News Desk The Kerala High Court Advocates Association(KHCAA) submitted its opinion to the expert committee, headed by...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 22, 2024 by News Desk The Bombay High Court recently condemned an Additional Sessions Judge for inappropriately using the word...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 21, 2024 by News Desk It was ruled by the Kerala HC that if an employee is sharing messages and...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 21, 2024 by News Desk The recent ruling by the Madras High Court clarifies the legal stance regarding property inheritance...