Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Throwing Love Chit At Married Woman Is Outraging Modesty:Bombay HC.

In a criminal revision application filed against a judgment passed in 2018 where the applicant was convicted, the High Court of Bombay observed that “the very act of throwing a chit on a woman’s person which professes love for her and which contains poetic verses, albeit extremely, purely written is sufficient to outrage the modesty of a woman”

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on August 11, 2021 by Administrator

By- Arshita Anand.

In a criminal revision application filed against a judgment passed in 2018 where the applicant was convicted, the High Court of Bombay observed that “the very act of throwing a chit on a woman’s person which professes love for her and which contains poetic verses, albeit extremely, purely written is sufficient to outrage the modesty of a woman”

An FIR was lodged by the victim stating that the applicant had tried to hand over a chit to her. When she refused to accept the same, he threw it on her and left muttering “I love you”. It was further alleged that the next morning, the applicant made obscene gestures and warned her not to disclose the contents of the chit to anyone.

The applicant was held guilty under under Section 354, Section 509 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). However, Justice Rohit B Deo observed that section 506 was not applicable in this case.

“The sine qua non ingredients of Section 506 is criminal intimidation as defined in Section 503 of the IPC. A bare perusal of Section 503 would reveal that the threat must be with intent to cause injury either to person, reputation or property and the intent must be to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do”

The Court also said that since the incident occurred ten years back, the applicant deserved a chance to reform and further incarceration was not likely to be of any avail. Thus, the applicant’s punishment of imprisonment of 2 years by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court 8, Akola was done away with as the applicant had already spent 45 days in incarceration.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisement

Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on April 29, 2024 by News Desk The Delhi HC refused to entertain a PIL whereby an authoritative interpretation of section 66...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on April 27, 2024 by News Desk The Karnataka High Court has recently observed that the promises which have been mentioned in...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on April 27, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court emphasized the fundamental right to information...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on April 27, 2024 by News Desk Introduction: India’s electoral system stands as a testament to the vibrancy and inclusivity of its...