SLC Reads

Roaming on streets at night is not an offence: Mumbai Magistrate Court

Written by Rhythm Agal

In the case, State of Maharashtra v. Sumitkumar Basantram Kashyap, the prosecution alleged that the respondent is guilty under Section 122(b), which criminalizes the act of covering face between sunset and sunrise to commit an offense. 

When found, the accused was standing with his face covered with a handkerchief and, when patrolling officers asked questions, could not answer them correctly. Considering the ambiguity in the answers, a First Information Report (FIR) was filed against him under Section 122 (b). 

The Court in the case decided that wandering on the streets at 1.30 am is not an offense. The Metropolitan Magistrate at Girgaon, Mumbai NA Patel stated that 1.30 am in a city like Mumbai is not late, and even if not considering that, no night curfew was enforced at the relevant time. He also mentioned that a person using a handkerchief instead of a mask could not be said to be using it to hide their identity. 

As a result, the Court decided to acquit the man three days after his arrest, deciding he was not guilty. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 23, 2024 by News Desk The Kerala High Court Advocates Association(KHCAA) submitted its opinion to the expert committee, headed by...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 22, 2024 by News Desk The Bombay High Court recently condemned an Additional Sessions Judge for inappropriately using the word...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 21, 2024 by News Desk It was ruled by the Kerala HC that if an employee is sharing messages and...

Inside Court News

Last Updated on June 21, 2024 by News Desk The recent ruling by the Madras High Court clarifies the legal stance regarding property inheritance...

Exit mobile version